|
Let
us try and reveal what hides behind the alleged “truths” written
about the transplant of organs which is so avid and foolishly
accepted by the majority of people:
Allegation:
Donating organs is a noble and altruistic act.
Facts: It would be more
apt to say that whoever donates their organs intends to be free from
being labeled as unworthy and selfish. Also other motives, no less
noble, give ground for this, like fear from not following the others
and being convinced of the comforting belief that this good act will
be a credit in heaven. A person capable of thinking seriously about
the subject and, above all, listen to his intuitive voice, would never
donate his bodily organs under any circumstance.
Allegation:
The removal of organs for transplants is absolutely painless, as it
only takes place after a cerebral death has been certified.
Facts: Unfortunately till
today no donor could confirm this supposition. The concept of death
was conveniently altered to permit the practice of transplants.
Formerly a person was declared dead when his blood stopped flowing.
Today, with the innovation of cerebral death a person dies well before
this, and all his vital organs are still working, including the heart.
To be of any use for transplants, lungs, kidneys, liver, pancreas and
the heart itself need to be removed while the latter is still beating.
But what in fact happens is that while the soul remains linked to the
physical body, which generally lasts for some days after the
terrestrial death, the donor will feel, in the most painful way, the
entire process of the removal of his organs. The fact that whether or
not he believed in life after death while he was alive on Earth now is
absolutely irrelevant, his belief or skepticism does not free him from
experiencing this horror, totally impotent, soon after the so-called
“cerebral death.”
Allegation: Today, the process of rejection
is totally controlled.
Facts: The natural
rejection of the body to the implant of other people’s organs can be
controlled by the use of drugs, but not eliminated. There is no “cure”
to rejection. The transplant patient will never be able to stop using
these drugs, which in fact inhibit his body’s capacity of reacting
against an external aggression. From the fact of it being a natural
process, rejection should have been seen as an alert against the
practice of transplants. But no, that would be expecting too much from
medical science. With its intellectual blinkers, always avoiding what
is merely terrestrial before it, researchers preferred to develop ever
more potent immune-depressant drugs, in order to artificially stretch
to a maximum the life of their human guinea pigs.
Allegation: The donation of organs is an act of love, one of
self-denial. That is why, it is neither lawful for a person to sell an
organ for the means of a transplant, nor is it unlawful for one to be
deprived of a transplant without the donor’s knowledge or
authorization.
Facts: It is not what
some distinguished people think, who go to great pains to continually
improve the lie of the century, much less of what happens in several
parts of the world: In an article published in the Journal of Medical
Ethics (irony), an English teacher tranquilizes the emergent class of
nephrology merchants: “There are no conclusive moral arguments against
the payment for the donation of kidneys.” The manager of a French
institution specialized in this activity has a clean conscious: “It is
a gratifying process, because you manage to make two people happy.” A
teacher of Bioethics - in a new position of medical education
(useless, without a doubt) - is convinced that humanity is going
through a market evolution: “In the days of slavery a man was sold in
his entirety; today, kidneys are bought and sold with ease in India
and other countries. In fact, there are already tourist agencies in
Europe that sell a complete package for US$ 20,000, which includes
passage, internment, the buying of the kidney and its surgical
transplant. In 1989 the magazine, The Lancet, publicized for the first
time that kidneys were being removed from death row prisoners in
Canton, China. The kidney is certainly the most sought after
merchandise, and it is already possible to order on the international
market, that and any part of the human body too: corneas, livers,
lungs, etc. In an article published in the magazine Philosophy, a
scientist proposed the creation of a “survival lottery,” in which each
person would receive a number to participate in a compulsory draw. The
drawn person would be killed and his organs distributed to the group
members that needed one of more transplants; this way many lives could
be saved sacrificing one person only... The latest novelty came from
Dr. James Watson, who from the pillar of his authority, The Noble
Prize for Medicine, threatened: “When we can produce an android with
perfect human organs and without a brain, to supply us with organs for
transplants, we shall make it and that’s that!”
Allegation: If you do not donate your organs, after you die, they
will be eaten by the worms underground; that is why it is better to
give them a nobler cause.
Facts: Through his
chronic ignorance in relation to spiritual life, and his incurable
propensity in accepting any thing, without contemplation, by just
discerning in material happenings, the human being is easily persuaded
to believe in anything that is said. So, all that surpasses his narrow
field of material vision, he simply declares as nonexistent and is
content with that. Or, then, through his incorrigible indolence, he
apathetically accepts some religious suppositions about the hereafter
and calmly goes to sleep, in the sleep of the righteous. The human
body is not a machine, whose parts can be substituted by original
replacement parts as soon as they present some defect. The body is an
instrument that facilitates the performance of the spirit in matter.
It is lent exclusively to one spirit, during its journey in gross
matter; which on completion should be returned to earth. During the
time of its use it should be very well cared for and preserved,
without which the spirit cannot act, as it should. If one of its parts
presents a problem, either it is a sign that it was not well taken
care of, or then that the respective spirit brought karmic baggage
that had to manifest itself in the terrestrial body, generating
illness. In both cases, the responsible one for the flaw of some
bodily organ is the human spirit, itself; it is never because of “bad
luck of destiny.” What the transplant provides is the impossibility
of the transplanted to remit, through the recognition of some
reciprocal guilt from a previous life, and he overburdens himself with
more guilt too. With respect to the donor, it is enough to say that
the spirit is linked to the body in incarnation, and remains attached
to the parts of that body when they continue to function in another
body. Because of the apprentices of Frankenstein, the donors of organs
are unable to ascend to other spheres of Creation after their death.
That
is it, lie upon lie and all of them with the appearance of crystal
pure truths.
If the
human being insists in believing in the allegations of medical science
about transplants that is his problem. But what he cannot admit, in
any hypothesis, is that he has only been shown one side of the coin, a
position that forms an ally with the human tendency of “doing what
everybody does” it really obscures the capacity to decide with the
exemption, when decision making is not totally impeded.
Maybe
a lot of suffering could have been avoid in Nazi Germany, if there was
really a free press at that time, impartial and courageous, that even
unable to openly oppose the reining power, at least it could have
shown the citizens of Germany the dark side of the regime. Today, the
tyrannical world ideology of organ transplants practically does not
find any opponents. It is Big Brother that bends governments and
people under a compulsory and unforeseen dictatorship. However, there
is still time to recover the lost freedom. At least the freedom of
deciding.
|
