|
When we are still
children we learn that nobody has the right, either to take the life
of another or one’s own. Both the religious precepts and national
laws expressly prohibit it, and the character of many well
intentioned people take special care of maintaining it firmly in
place, deep in the core of the individual’s conscience. And this
conscience for the most part is painfully molded by continual shocks
from an early age, when the child and the pre-adolescent is forced
to verify, with perplexity and incomprehension, that this very basic
precept, so sacred – of the prohibition of provoking the extinction
of life – is disrespected in this world at each fraction of a
second, and through multiple forms.
For these good natured people,
the horror evoked by assaults and massacres is such, that they simply
cannot admit that the State promotes a similar horror, under the
protection of the law; this is without taking into account that many
statistics demonstrate that the crime rate has not dropped
significantly at all in countries where capital punishment has been
adopted. In fact this is the principal argument against the death
penalty, still sustained by the assertive contusion that only the One
that gave life, has the prerogative of taking it, that is to say, it
would be an act beyond that of human hands. This is a powerful
argument, worthy of respect, because it shows a sincere will to do the
right thing.
Nevertheless, there is a fundamental flaw in this
conception, a flaw that is just not recognized in virtue of the lack
of vision on the true connections that determine human life.
The aversion of a good person, facing the
possibility of removing a human’s life, is perfectly comprehensible.
But this aversion only exists because the person judges that everybody
that lives on Earth is also human like him too. That’s where the error
lies. For example, the so-called hardened criminals; psychopaths that
kill, rape and inflict every type of cruelty while carrying out their
criminal acts are not really human beings anymore. Indeed, externally
they still have a human appearance, but that absolutely does not make
them a human being, for the physical human body is just a tool of the
spirit, and only a live spirit can be called a human being. The
material body is no warranty at all that a human being still lives
inside it.
The spirits of these ex-humans are already dead,
and the appearances of their souls haven’t the slightest likeness to
that of the human form anymore. They are monsters in the most profound
meaning of the word, indescribable aberrations that defile the Earth
with their disgusting presence. They find themselves at a level that
is well below the one occupied by any insect, independent of how
insignificant it is. They are even worth less than a pathogenic virus,
which has a function to execute and it executes it integrally, while
an aberration of this type that only resembles a human being
externally is nothing, this spirit is nothing but a pile of
decomposing garbage, that only here on Earth, under the protection of
the material body, is it still capable of carrying out its atrocities.
Many of these “things” admit that they will kill
and rape again in case they manage to escape from prison. Then are we
going to take care of them for years, feed them and treat them until
they do what they intended? What would we do if by chance we come
across a pile of stinking garbage in the middle of our living room at
home? Would we cover it with a protective dome so that it doesn’t
spread or would we immediately throw it away in the trash can?
Human rights, as the name itself says, are destined
for human beings. Only humans deserve to usufruct human rights. The
others cannot, for they are not humans anymore. And they will never be
again. Give a serial killer all the necessary conditions for
rehabilitation; all the support, all the social assistance one can
imagine, and none of this will have any effect. The serial killer will
continue being a non-human, he cannot be one anymore.
From this point of view, the denomination “capital
punishment” is not adequate. It is not exactly a punishment, but
indeed it is a right. It is a death right of society, because there is
no reason why one has to live constrained, and concealed because of
the filth.
But neither is the desire for revenge justified in
any way as an incentive for this death right. Revenge and hate are
very negative sentiments that through reciprocity can only bring
multiplied misfortune to those who nurture it inside themselves, even
when we direct it at criminals. The death right is just the right of
living without garbage in the living room.
When present day life is analyzed under a wider
lens, not only restricting it to what is merely terrestrial, the
apparent incongruities vanish automatically, while some established
and accepted concepts that were considered as solid show all their
vacuity with frightening clearness. So let’s have a look at abortion.
As the death right mentioned previously is the only valid
justification to take the physical life of an evil being, as we are
not dealing with a human being anymore, it is inconceivable that a
woman feels she has the right of practicing abortion, with the idea
that she can deal with her body as she sees fit. A pregnancy,
voluntary or not, is equal to a “request for life” according to the
laws of nature, and it is not a death right. Abortion is nothing but a
crime, that subjects the woman who practices it to serious
consequences belonging to the soul, of which she will only become
aware of when she has left this life. Rape would be the only
exception, because it is easy to imagine what species of creature can
incorporate in a body through this type of conception.
By the same reason no human being has the right of
taking one’s own life. In fact, one needs to be an exceptional coward
to commit suicide. Suicide is cowardice in itself, it is the most
shameful admission of defeat imposed by spiritual lethargy, it is the
confession of one’s absolute inner weakness, of one’s own incapacity
to withstand the retroactive effects of his own wrong acts, it is
one’s own admission of total incompetence in obtaining personal
maturity through the indispensable experience of life. A suicide
victim is a deplorable creature, who by his act mocks the gift of life
presented by his Creator.
And euthanasia? Would it also be a crime or more a
death right? It is necessary to differentiate. There are, in fact, two
types: active and passive. Active euthanasia means to establish
procedures, which include the ministration of drugs that abbreviates
the life of a sick patient, considered as a lost case. But passive
euthanasia is limited to depriving technical resources capable of
stretching out a terminal patient's life artificially, for example
machines that substitute part of the vital functions of the body. The
former type of euthanasia is a disguised suicide, while the latter is
a legitimate death right.
Passive euthanasia is the right that befits a sick
patient of dying with dignity. Only the most hardened, rigid and
“brutish” materialist can find some justification in keeping a person
in a coma for months, even years, by the use of machines. One must be
really dull witted to call such a situation “life”. Because for the
materialist only terrestrial life exists, thus the materialists thinks
it is preferable “to live” this way instead of simply dying naturally.
The exacerbated selfishness of the relatives who are responsible for
the dying patient also holds great weight here, as they demand that
the patient remain in this world at any price, even if it is as a
vegetable.
Passive euthanasia and the elimination of
unrecoverable criminals are two situations by which the death right
stands. However, when this current purification process is over on
Earth, when the new age has been implanted, these two situations will
also have disappeared. The terrible diseases like the ones that sinful
humanity today suffers will have ceased to exist, because none of the
remaining humans will need to be affected by them. And the so-called
heinous crimes will just be a sad recollection in the memory of the
purified human beings, a bitter remembrance of an era when monsters
inhabited the planet, of a period when the living walked among the
dead... Those spiritually alive and those spiritually dead, for there
are no others.
Nevertheless, this anxious reminiscence will soon
be supplanted by the cheerful and tranquilizing certainty that all
types of walking dead, including the group that are today still
incorrectly and euphemistically called “human beings of a criminal
nature”, will be swept away forever from the wonderful work of
Creation.
|
